


A very close friend, who I love so much, sent me an email regarding the building of a fence along our southern boarder with Mexico. It was a petition asking Congress to push fence/wall building legislation through as fast as is possible, in a form as close to its original bill, and get the construction underway immediately. The intent of the bill and the fence is aimed at stemming illegal immigration, controlling our boarders, and increasing our over all "Home Land Security." I could not, in good conscience, respond and email my approval to the petition's authors. I am seriously conflicted. Which way should our nation go on this issue?
One the one hand we have some valid security concerns regarding terrorism. How can we keep Islamic terrorists out if we can not control our boarders? We also have security challenges as it has to do with our economic future. Illegal aliens, it can be argued, cost the tax payers of the United States billions of dollars in legal and medical expenses. Along these same lines it is argued that they take jobs away from legal citizens. Another considerable issue is that the "Intrinsic Value" of citizenship is compromised if just anyone can come into our country unimpeded. There is a fear that illegal immigrants will be issued drivers licenses (there are movements afoot to do just such a thing) and given the privilege (which citizens consider a hard fought for right) to vote. With that sort of power given to illegal immigrants the entire political structure of the United States of America could be up for grabs. It was certainly a fear of the white segregationists in the south during the civil rights movement and their fears proved correct. Free and voting black citizens did in fact completely and permanently change the political landscape of the south. In this case, however, it was such a beautiful and nation saving event. ( See my writing on Taylor Branch's books on the civil rights movement.) Additionally there are issues of simple fairness. African Americans waited centuries, often sacrificed their lives in the effort to achieve their constitutional right to full citizenship and to vote. Many European immigrants stood for weeks in line at Elis Island and studied for years to become naturalized citizens. How can a nation such as ours, built on the rule of law, give away such a precious commodity to those who overtly ignore the rule of law? How could such a group possibly vote in the best interest of this nation whose citizenship they have obtained by illegal means?
On the other hand there are some interesting counter arguments. The fence/wall can be seen as an over reaction to a perceived threat that is really not there. Catching the bad guys is more complex than building a multi-billion dollar fence/wall. The fence will not "really" make us more secure. We may feel good about it, but reality will be quite different. There is also the issue of the United States Government not having in place a sound immigration system in tune with our neighbor, Mexico, and the economic needs of both countries. The system is anything but high tech and efficient. This slow and archaic system is seen as the real culprit and the energy of the nation should be directed towards fixing it. Blaming the businesses that need the workers, blaming the poor who are willing to work hard for their under nourished families, and creating high paying jobs for yet another new government agency, to build and monitor this modern China like barrier, is seen as a false economy. There is the posibility that some of our national leaders are using southern boarder issues as a tool to unite our nation's political will by creating an "enemy" and "fear" that is statistically insignificant. The boarder may be a political red herring, and worse, illegal immigrants are being made scapegoats for abstract political reasons.
Another interesting point has to do with Canada and our boarder with them. There is very little political pressure and will to create a fence/wall on our northern boarder. There are some who are pushing for such a thing, but they are relatively few. The political pressure is on the southern boarder. This begs a few challenging questions for those of us who are believers in Christ. Why? Why only Mexico? Is it that terrorists are more likely to enter that way? Hum? All the 9/11 criminals came in through the east coast and Canada by air. A fence or wall would not have stopped them. Is it simply because of economic pressures and securing our economy? Well, our economy has been growing off and on (and mostly on) my entire life. We have had some set backs, but they were short and followed by long and strong growth. Or is it more cultural? Mexicans speak Spanish and "We the People" speak English. Our language and identity are at stake. But, my great grand and grand parents spoke Bohemian, German, and Irish. Somehow we survived and became what we are today. Most challenging is the idea that we fear those from Mexico and other Central and South American countries because they are perceived as "racially different." They are people of color. Their values are different, feared and not understood. That is the threat! God forbid this is the "real reason!" Haven't we learned our lesson on race well enough? It too is a wall. It is America's worst and most lingering sin. What amount of economic suffering has slavery and racism exacted upon our nation and its citizens lives? One can not imagine. No fence needed up north because "they are European up there." A fence down south because "they are people of color." This is a challenge and I believe that there are those in our nation, and many in The Church, who want that fence for that reason. They want to maintain a racial status quo. They want to keep the nation the way they think it was, which is always better that the way they think others may change it.
My biggest challenge to the creation of this southern barrier has three elements to it. First, it has been my experience that fences and walls are contagious. I remember living in a Chicago suburb and my father building a house in the middle of the end of a new block. Before all the houses were completed he was able to look out his back sliding glass door and see one quarter of a mile into the distance. He dreamed of everyone having a communal view with beautiful green grass, swing sets, patios, parents, and children all enjoying and playing in this boundary free private park, inviting each other over for dinner routinely and with ease. My father had grown up in the inner city where the finest view he had was of a Chicago brick wall a few feet from his bedroom window. Sadly, one day my father looked out the back window and saw the first chain link fence in place some distance down the block. He was devastated. He knew what was coming and sure enough within one summer everyone but my home had a fence and, ironically, we were virtually fenced in by our three neighbors one on each side and the one behind us. Dad saved money on a fence he didn't want. He only connected when it was necessary for the safety of his aging mother and our dog. Had no one else put up a fence he would have found another solution. A couple of years later honeysuckle hedges were in place and Dad could see no further than the end of his short back yard. The children, the barbecues, the patios, and most importantly the conversations and faces were gone, no longer a possibility.
Secondly, walls and fences are very successful at keeping people out. But, there is also a potential down side. They also work to keep people in. The same fence can do both equally well. What is it that can change a fence or wall's mission from keeping out to keeping in? A man or a nation's heart. This concerns many, myself included.
Finally, walls by definition represent and create separation. Biblically separation is one of the grandest consequences of sin. Men and women became separated from their creator. Sin is "THE WALL" and keeping it in place in our lives, not surrendering to Jesus Christ and allowing Him to be our Lord and Savior, brings about continued alienation and ultimately death. Walls are used for protection and they are used to create prisons. Building a barrier on our southern boarder may have many, many unforeseen consequences. Since we have survived and thrived as a nation for some 232 years without one, are the potential benefits worth the potential risks? Walls create "thems", "others", "not us'es", "strangers", and propagate "enemies." Do we, as a nation, want to create and nurture this type of international environment?
I feel some sort of wall is to be built. The snow ball is heading down hill and gaining momentum. I feel this simply because of my years of experience listening to and participating in political discourse. However, I have some fear and trembling. In not overtly supporting it I am attempting to delay it. I am not a liberal or conservative on this matter. I am neither courageous nor a coward. No, I am a baby boomer who grew up and lived in the shadow and fears of the cold war from birth to 1989. Trust me when I say that this was a long time. The only wall that existed then was the Berlin Wall that I have pictured above. It shows a guard (middle picture)from East Germany successfully escaping to the west, a famous image of an East German (top) who was shot by East German guards and the world watched him bleed to death, and the West German side colorfully decorated in protest to oppression juxtaposed to the drab and colorless side, the Soviet communist prison of East Berlin. To this observer walls did not then, and never in the future will, represent freedom and security. They will represent only oppression and alienation.
What are some of your thoughts? I'd like to hear from you. I'd love to hear from my close friend. This is a big time current event and the one chosen to be our next president and his or her party will have great say as to whether it will be built and what form this barrier will take.